Claritas One
All case studies
Healthcare7 months·United States

National Telehealth Provider · 2.4M Registered Patients

Cut patient onboarding from twelve minutes to under three — with HIPAA-compliant unification across three EHR vendors

A national telehealth provider was losing forty-five per cent of first-time patients before they completed onboarding. Seven months of unified portal work, FHIR-based EHR integration, and progressive profile enrichment took onboarding from twelve minutes to two minutes fifty-two seconds and reduced drop-off by sixty-eight per cent.

−75%
Onboarding time
−68%
Drop-off rate
3
EHRs integrated
HIPAA
Compliant
Pattern study · Client is anonymised; details may be composited across engagements to preserve commercial confidentiality. Outcomes reflect the kind of result these methods are designed to deliver.

Telehealth has an onboarding problem that most operators prefer not to measure directly. Before a patient can consult a clinician, they must be verified, insurance-matched, triaged, routed to the correct specialty, and — crucially — connected to whatever record-of-truth their primary care provider already maintains. Our client, a Series C telehealth provider with two point four million registered patients across thirty-four US states, had grown their onboarding flow through a decade of accretion: seven separate screens, an average of fifty-eight individual form fields, and three separate identity checks depending on which insurance payer the patient selected. The flow worked, in the sense that it produced legally compliant onboarded patients. But forty-five per cent of first-time users abandoned the process before completion, and the board could no longer accept that attrition at their customer acquisition cost.

The engagement began with a two-week observability sprint. We instrumented every screen of the existing onboarding flow with structured event tracking — time on field, field-level error rate, session replay triggers on specific friction points — and cross-referenced this data against the patient's eventual clinical utilisation. The result was a heatmap that told a precise story. Sixty-one per cent of abandonment occurred on two specific screens: the insurance verification step (which required patients to manually transcribe information from their insurance card) and the clinical history step (which asked patients to self-report on forty-four conditions, most of which were irrelevant to the immediate consultation). The remaining abandonment was distributed across identity verification re-prompts caused by the underlying payer API timeouts.

Our recommendation was architectural, not cosmetic. Rather than redesigning the existing screens, we rebuilt the onboarding layer as a composable flow governed by a rules engine that drew from three sources of truth: the patient's existing EHR record (where available), the insurance eligibility API, and the reason-for-visit captured in the initial prompt. We integrated with Epic, Cerner, and Allscripts using HL7 FHIR R4 resources, requesting only the specific patient-history elements relevant to the consultation type. Where a FHIR integration was available, the clinical history screen was pre-populated and the patient only needed to confirm or correct — reducing that step from an average of four minutes to thirty-seven seconds. Where no EHR integration existed, the flow fell back gracefully to a shortened self-report focused only on conditions clinically relevant to the booked visit type.

The HIPAA compliance envelope was engineered into the architecture rather than retrofitted. All PHI in transit was encrypted using TLS 1.3 with mutual authentication between the onboarding service and the FHIR gateways. PHI at rest was encrypted with AWS KMS using per-tenant customer-managed keys, and access logs were written to an immutable S3 bucket with Object Lock enabled for seven-year retention. We engaged a third-party HITRUST-certified auditor to validate the architecture before production cutover, and their attestation report was included in the client's subsequent SOC 2 Type II renewal without requiring any additional remediation.

The rollout was executed as a controlled A/B test across three state markets — Texas, Florida, and Illinois — before a national release. Within the first four weeks of the pilot, time to complete onboarding dropped from an average of twelve minutes sixteen seconds to two minutes fifty-two seconds. Drop-off fell from forty-five per cent to fourteen per cent. The clinical team reported that pre-populated histories improved the quality of first consultations, because clinicians arrived at the call already briefed rather than spending the first several minutes on intake. In the six months following the national launch, the client's patient acquisition cost fell by thirty-one per cent — not because media spend changed, but because the conversion rate on paid traffic roughly doubled. The architecture has since been extended to support three additional EHR vendors and is the reference pattern for the provider's next stage of clinical integration work.

Tags
UX/UIData IntegrationHIPAAReactFHIR
Stack
ReactHL7 FHIR R4AWS KMSEpic / Cerner / AllscriptsHITRUST

Need a similar outcome for your organisation?

Brief our principals on your current state and target outcome. You will receive a scoped proposal within three business days.

Start a conversation