Claritas One
Consulting/Data Strategy/Data Governance

Data Governance

Contracts, ownership, lineage, and quality instrumentation — the production-grade machinery that turns a fragmented data estate into an auditable asset your board, regulator, and AI models can all rely on.

The trust deficit

Governance is not a policy. It is a production system.

PowerPoint frameworks don't move data quality. Live contracts, enforced lineage, and automated quality gates do — and their absence costs measurably every quarter.

Without governance
  • 67% of executives doubt the numbers in their own board pack
  • $12.9M average annual cost per enterprise of poor data quality
  • 73% of AI programmes stall on data quality, not model quality
  • 11 months — median remediation time for a single GDPR breach

The six dimensions of quality

Quality isn't one number. It's six, on every domain.

Every critical data domain gets scored along these dimensions. Thresholds are agreed with the business owner; breaches route to them, not the engineering queue.

01

Accuracy

Values match the ground truth in the source system.

Measured as

Match rate to system-of-record

02

Completeness

Required attributes are populated at a known threshold.

Measured as

% fill for mandatory fields

03

Consistency

The same entity reads identically across domains.

Measured as

Cross-domain entity drift

04

Timeliness

Data arrives within the SLA the consumer needs.

Measured as

Freshness p95 latency

05

Uniqueness

Each real-world entity appears exactly once.

Measured as

Duplicate rate per 10k

06

Validity

Values conform to format, range, and business rules.

Measured as

Constraint violation rate

Anatomy of a data contract

The atomic unit of modern governance.

Every critical dataset is shipped with a contract: schema, owner, SLA, quality thresholds, and breach behaviour. CI refuses merges that violate it. Consumers can trust it without asking a human.

Owner
A named domain steward — not a team DL.
Schema
Typed columns, required fields, allowed ranges.
Quality
Thresholds per dimension; breach routes to owner.
SLA
Freshness, uptime, and deprecation notice period.
contracts/customer_v2.yamlv2.1.0
dataset: customer
version: 2.1.0
owner:
  domain: customer-360
  steward: a.mackenzie@claritas
  escalation: cdo@claritas

schema:
  customer_id:   { type: uuid, required: true }
  email:         { type: string, pii: true, format: email }
  created_at:    { type: timestamp, required: true }
  lifetime_value:{ type: decimal, min: 0 }

quality:
  completeness:  { email: ">= 0.98" }
  uniqueness:    { customer_id: "== 1.0" }
  timeliness:    { freshness_p95: "< 15m" }
  validity:      { email_format: ">= 0.995" }

sla:
  availability:  99.9%
  deprecation:   90 days
  on_breach:     page_owner + freeze_downstream

privacy:
  classification: restricted
  retention:      7y
  jurisdictions:  [EU, UK, US]

Before / after

What changes when the programme lands.

Metric definitionsLive in analysts' headsCertified in the semantic layer
Quality monitoringAfter the board sees itBreaches page the domain owner
OwnershipUnclear — escalates to the CDODomain steward, RACI published
LineageTribal knowledge of the ETL teamAutomated, column-level, queryable
Privacy obligationsSpreadsheet of field classificationsEncoded in the contract, enforced in CI
Change managementSilent breaking schema changesDeprecation windows, blast-radius alerts

The programme, in five stages

A 24-week path to production-grade governance.

Stage 01 · Weeks 1–4

Landscape Assessment

A DAMA-DMBOK-benchmarked diagnostic across six dimensions of governance maturity. Includes data-estate inventory, lineage sampling, and a scored heatmap that becomes the programme&apos;s baseline.

Outputs

Maturity scorecardEstate inventoryQuick-win register

A real incident, replayed

The quiet difference a contract makes.

One morning at a previous client: a CRM product team shipped a schema change at 09:00. Here is how it played out.

00:00

Upstream CRM schema change silently removes a required field.

00:01

Contract check in CI fails the pull request.

00:01

Domain steward is paged; downstream consumers are frozen.

00:14

Steward approves a deprecation window for consumers.

00:42

Patched schema merges with backfill plan. Consumers unblock.

∞ vs.

Without governance: 9 days to detection via a wrong board metric.

Capabilities

What a production-grade governance function actually contains.

Governance operating model

  • Data domain & steward network
  • Governance council + delegated authority
  • Policy hierarchy and exceptions
  • Stewardship RACI and performance metrics

Quality & contracts

  • Contract template (schema + SLA + quality)
  • CI/CD enforcement & breach paging
  • Quality dashboards by domain & consumer
  • Deprecation windows & blast-radius alerts

Metadata & lineage

  • Active catalogue (Atlan / Collibra / Alation)
  • Column-level lineage across the estate
  • Impact analysis & change management
  • Glossary + certified semantic terms

Privacy & regulatory

  • Classification framework (restricted / confidential / public)
  • Retention encoded in contract layer
  • GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA, EU AI Act readiness
  • On-demand audit evidence generation

Next step

A governance diagnostic,
returned in two weeks.

We run a free, two-week governance diagnostic — maturity score, three quick wins, and a sequenced 18-month plan. No deck, no sales pitch, no obligation.

What you'll receive
  • Maturity scorecard across 6 dimensions
  • Ranked list of 3 quick wins
  • 18-month sequenced roadmap
  • Investment envelope & headcount plan
Next capabilityBusiness Intelligence